The Journey and the Destination

A friend recently stated that he thought that I was more intelligent than he was. I’m kind of embarrassed at the fact that I didn’t immediately deny it. First because I think it’s common courtesy to deny it initially, even if you think such a statement is true. Second because I don’t actually think that it’s true. Or rather, I think it’s only partially true. In the same way I think it’s partially true that he is more intelligent than I am. It’s basically the difference between the journey and the destination.

I always have the destination in mind. I must always know that an idea that I’m exploring has an answer, even if I don’t know it. Even if I in fact know that I will never know it. The process of thought is meant to draw as close as possible to that answer, even when it is in practice far beyond reach.

I think he always has the journey in mind. An idea need not have an answer that can be discovered. The exploration of an idea and the lessons that can be learned from it are the real focus of thought. This can be a much more introspective way of thinking, with less tangible, but no less important and possibly more personally satisfying results.

The two modes of thought are very different, and they result in different ways of expressing ourselves. Mine lends itself to definitive statements which can be easy to evaluate. His leads to deeper philosophical statements which can be more difficult to evaluate. It’s this difference that I think leads to his perception of an inequality between us that I don’t think really exists.

 



This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009 at 11:23 am and is filed under Random Crap. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Related Posts

  • No related posts found.

One Response to ' The Journey and the Destination '

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to ' The Journey and the Destination '.

  1. 1
    NounTheClown said,

    on September 2nd, 2009 at 2:40 pm

    When said like that, really I cannot argue with you. Its your opinion, so I thank you for the compliment, but still disagree with you. Recently it has come to my attention that I am really not as smart as I think in the area of problem solving (which is a problem in and of itself to solve). Let’s assume that we had a standard IQ test. We have already discussed that you end up slightly higher on a standard IQ test than I (my own being about 129 on a good day). If we were to use Gardners approach I may end up slightly higher in some areas than you. Triarchic Theory I think is the one where I would absolutely outperform you in several categories, Those being Creative Intelligence and Practical Intelligence. So you are correct in a way, but honestly I believe what is happening is that I know where I lack, and I see those specific types of intelligence in you, in great quantities, in short, you complete me…. let’s have a bromance.

Leave a reply



Meta